Movies Features
By Scott Rosenberg Apr 4, 2006, 12:16 GMT
Movie downloads an evolutionary idea?
And Also
Latest Headlines in Movies
- 1. Pattinson, Ravin, Brosnan in new 'Remember Me' trailer
- 2. Vampire mayhem in second 'Daybreakers' trailer
- 3. Pearce feeling 'Hungry'
- 4. Donnelly and Oppenheimer go for 'Fortune'
- 5. Anthony Peckham to immerse in 'Deep Sea'
Older Talkback
When will the industry realize that consumers don't want to watch movies on their PCs? What we need is a service that consists of a set-top box that would take the place of your DVD player. You could download HD-quality movies from the box and watch directly on your HDTV/home theater. Better yet, studios can put a limit on the time you have to view the movie. For example, pay $5 for a limited viewing window or pay $20 and you can store it on your box for as long as you want. This way, everybody wins!
why would I want to pay $20-30 US to download a movie to my PC that I cannot even burn to a DVD or play in my DVD player. I can get the DVD for $25-30 CDN and play it anywhere. Besides, look at the time & disk space required to do this. Imagine downloading the 3-part extended version of lord of the rings with all the extras. No thanks.
Have you ever heard of Microsoft Media Center? You can download videos right off the internet and watch them on your tv! amazing...
I believe the movie theater will die a slow death but will remain for sometime yet. My home theater wins especially when compared to outrageous movie theater prices and the occasional screaming baby.
Movies downloaded by users will have to be priced less than those available on DVD to become a serious market contender. If Apple is successful using the same marketing angle on movies that has been so successful with the IPOD, the world will be a better place but the home entertainment center as most people know it will have to be further developed. Enter Microsoft.
Also, the 2002 patent for interactive virtual sex using the internet will prove to be a historical and significant mile stone for media technology and applications. It appears that the future is catching up with us.
Good article.
DUH. Yes, downloading movies will take off (I'm a tech spec too)... Yes, it is worth watching downloads with a 'loved one' (or somebody else, or alone), depending on your video display tech... Yes, we do watch them on our PC's, Notebooks, other vid devices (and even cellphones)... and yes, the prices are too high, rentals will eventually be in line with local rental stores, and no-value added downloads should be available and without commercials, cheaper than DVD's. There is an online download market and it will grow... anybody naysaying doesn't understand the markets, not to mention the history the article printed. The major point is the studios themselves are finally providing their mainstream content online for download/purchase. '...the internet has really come of age' Universal Pictures president says... DUH. No I don't think downloads should be available the same day of release in theaters, but there will be theaters for some time to come, anyway... they're just complaining about their profit margins and competition... (whiners). Content will out, those standing in the way will eventually get run over by demand/profits.
This article is terrible. It's very poorly written, lacks conformity of style, and doesn't have much of a point. Why do you think this is a bad idea? Why would you not watch movies on your computer while drinking wine? Why would you rather buy DVDs? You never told us. If this was submitted to my school newspaper, I would demand that it be rewritten.
Hello, the big screen is now in the home. You can get them at 9 feet for $1100
Do you have an editor? Does anybody proof this stuff? Incredible...
I can't see it working one bit, people will still pirate movies and download it free on those bit-torrent sites with no restrictions! I mean $19.99 for a download , you corporate chiefs of these movie companys must be thick and must think we are too! Get in the real world! Pirate File sharing will never die!
Windows Media 2005: what more can you say? My family doesn't even consider watching ads anymore,..this can't last forever,..as who's going to profit by making tv shows that people can watch while easily skipping the ads? Unlike TIVO, this is a free deal forever. What's best is the XBOX360 downstairs receives all the same TV sans ads,..and that baby's hooked up to the plasma and surround sound.
I think Bill Gates will kill TV as we know it with this killer app. This is legal (for now) stealing, and once you've experienced it, are you ever going to slog through 25minutes of ads again to watch 37 minutes of TV? Are you going to make payments to TIVO,..when XBOX360 does your home theater for free?
Two last notes: I loved the timeline in the article, except the part where Finland had more cellphones per capita than anyone. Must be so next time Chernobyl goes, they'll all have advance warning time to pop their iodine. Also, I sadly gave up going to movies all together,..a few years ago. Almost without fail, every movie we were going to,..was out of focus, or too dark..or some clown was on a cell the entire time, or there were food fights, and worst of all,..sitting through 30 minutes of ads and previews. Insufferable. (it is ironic: movies 'coarsened' the culture so much..and now people have become so coarse they've killed the theater experience) I used to leave the movie feeling enraged, ripped off,..Now I drink wine in the romantic comfort of my livingroom, knowing I can freeze H-wood if the moment feels right.
I hate going to the movies. I don't care if theatre owners think simultaneous release would hurt their pockets, they've been ripping me off since birth. It's time for payback.
If the film industry thinks they can offer a download-to-own film that can only be played on a computer monitor screen, they need to visit CinemaNow.com's homepage and click on the 'Watch on your TV' link. Since Windows 98SE came out, and assuming a person has the appropriate video card installed, they can choose between watching video output on a monitor or on a TV screen (or both at the same time).
The problem? If the signal can be watched unfettered on a standard television set, it can also be captured by a VCR, a DVD recorder, or a capture card ... allowing the computer owner to burn a DVD copy of the capture (and even edit it to suit their tastes).
But...
I suspect the movie industry will do what it currently does via CinemaNow and other online movie outlets. In short, the product I expect to see appear will be a film whose quality-level is less than that of a VHS tape. Example? A year or so ago, I noticed that CinemaNow had a downloadable version of a film that has NEVER appeared on home video - 'The Dark At The Top Of The Stairs.' So, I downloaded the film ... which I could watch for 24 hours on my computer. But, my computer's video card allowed me to export the video signal to my 27' Curtis Mathes TV. On my computer monitor, the picture looked OK. But on my TV, the picture was just 'barely' watchable. There is NO WAY that anyone I know would pay the same price they'd pay for a DVD to get a downloaded film that isn't DVD-quality. While I was willing to part with $2.00 to 'rent' a downloaded film from CinemaNow, I would NOT be willing to buy it unless the quality was much higher. And unless it is much higher, I think the home video enthusiast will feel likewise.
I find this article a little inaccurate. I have a video card in my computer that allows me to hook up to my tv thru svideo or the standard video jack. If downloading a movie means that I have to pay the full retail price of a DVD, then I wouldn't use it. However, with the added options included in a bundle, with the ability to save this info for as long as I want, then bring it on! I would gladly download movies, and not have to worry about the packaging of a DVD and the effects that it has on the environment. Not to mention, theaters are worried that this will drive them out of business.....well don't charge me 6 bucks for popcorn when the total cost to you is less than a dime. People would always go to the theater to see a show if it wasn't such a drain on their wallet.
I thought your article as timely.
3 years ago a fellow that engineered small
computers for home use couldn't figure out
why people would want terabyte sized
storage for personal computers.
4 terabytes at that time was about all
that had been digitalized and put on
line from the Library of Congress.
CD's were once thought to be too
expensive and of too large of a capacity.
WiMax will make DSL look 9600 baud.
Dual layer DVD burners are nothing new.
Over 5 channel sound is available.
Plasma screens will come down in price,
and the sizes will grow.
Downloadable movies are here. Burnable's
(download and copy to keep) are next.
Movie theater viewership will continue to
decline, unless they drop their prices, or
come up with something new.
Moore's Law still exists.
And keeper prices will drop.
So what's the problem?
Let's see. I have a video store 30 minutes away that sells most new DVD sets for $14.95. So, I can drive for an hour, spend 15 minutes shopping, spend $15 plus tax and gas and have a DVD that will play on my home theater system or on my computer. Or, I can spend two hours downloading that smae DVD, spend twice as much, and have something that can only be played on my computer (perhaps on my TV). Which one do I choose?
This should fail miserably. Of course, if it does, the movie industry won't realize that it is due to a flawed business plan and overzealous digital rights management -- they'll just assume that comsumer's aren't ready for movie downloads yet. Which is a pity.
I Love Lucy was never in color. What is this guy smoking?
1987 saw the first Japanese ‘anime’, ‘The Simpsons’ were introduced on TV and in 1988 the sale of CD’s outsold vinyl records while 98% of American homes had at least one TV set.
not true, 'astroboy' in black and white was on TV in 63 I think it was, from Japan, so you are in error
thanks,
brett
Plainly and simply, I will never pay for DRM.
Why pay a company to treat you like a criminal?
Are the media executives even trying to think anymore?
I told people shortly after the PSP came out that the UMD videos would die. Not because it was a terrible idea, not because you couldn't burn your own UMDs (although that was an issue)...it was going to die because they were pricing movies above DVD prices with lower resolution, and no extra features. For crying out loud, my 12 year old figured that out and was asking me why anyone would be so stupid to pay $22 for a UMD video when the DVD was $15. UMDs could have worked for $9.99 and a number of people would have picked up that and DVD.
And here we go again with the downloadable movies. iTunes was a success because you could pick up a song for...well...a song. It costs less for a format that is good enough, and you didn't have to buy a whole album to get to a song or two.
My message to media executives: Stop paying through the nose for high-priced MBAs. Hire my 12 year old and you might actually see growth again.
Do we know what quality they are going to have the movies? Your right that there is no point to pay for more for a downloadable movie if A) the Quality sucks B) you can't take the time to download it C) its missing the features the DVD will have(added content).
Right now America is getting hosed by the Theatres because of price, the Movie companies because they continue to charge us more and accuse the general public of stealing from them, and (to me the most annoying) the Internet Service Providers because we pay more money than most of the world(90%) for our Internet Service and are in the bottom 10% in Quality of Service and Speed! If your on Dialup you'd be insane to try to download movies, but people will try and they will fail.
Not the general public (they're still on dialup), but some of us will be able to download movies because of DSL and Cable in a timely fashion. They're ramping up WiMax (802.16) and that will continue to grow and expand, spreading Highspeed internet wireless through urban and rural areas. Intel is working on their ViV chipsets to allow replication and easier distribution of Media throughout the household.
A good video card allows me to watch movies on my 19in LCD panel at home, I've got component hookups, S-video, and all the works but whoever said that if the quality sux and if I have trouble porting my newly downloaded movie to my soon to be purchased 50' HD-TV ... here comes another way to be ripped off by the 'Movie Industry'. (File servers are great, however Media-center seems to be a dressed up version of XP.)






Your Talkback on this Story