LGDec 27th, 2007 - 17:34:16

....and your point is?

Because as far as I can see you haven't offered any reasons as to why you think this study is a load of nonsense. Of course you could have said the participant sample was too small (it is). That it did not adequately reflect the propotion of the population it was professing to study (it didn't) or that the study did not come to any definate conclusions regarding the cause of said reduced blood flow (it didn't....did it?).

Report this comment

LGDec 27th, 2007 - 17:36:46

Btw....I've just finished a 9hr UT frag-feast. If anything....the blood's pumping faster.

Report this comment

Wth?Dec 29th, 2007 - 17:32:10

WEll this is stupid.

I bet they did not take into account about a million different factors affecting the outcome. Its not very sceintific.

Report this comment

ahhhhDec 29th, 2007 - 19:25:46

Yes I do concur with the good Doctor's findings. My own secretely funded research program has determined that watching excess amounts of the television program called WWE RAW & Smackdown actually increased ones higher brain functions upwards to 2.5% on the average.

What a crock of crap! These jerks can pay scientists to say anything they want. They can manufacture any kind of threat or emergency by providing big funding for pet projects while also paying for propoganda ads and stunts to promote their lies.

What next? Mathematics proved to be systematically racist? LOL

Report this comment