DVD Reviews

DVD Review: Wolf Creek

By Jeff Swindoll Apr 20, 2006, 0:34 GMT

“30,000 people are reported missing in Australia every year. 90% are found within a month. Some are never seen again.”

The movie claims to be inspired by actual events, but it also seems to be inspired by many of the great horror films that laid the groundwork for this type of genre, and will draw comparisons to recent horror hits. In 1999, two British girls Kristy (Kestie Morassi) and Liz (Cassandra Magrath) and an Australian guy named Ben (Nathan Phillips) decide to pool their money and resources and buy and car and head to Wolf Creek National Park to check out the Wolf Creek Meteor crater. After the long trip, in which they have a short chat about UFOs, have a little who do you want to be your girlfriend angst, and encounter some semi-unfriendly Outback gas station folk, they finally arrive at the park and take the 3 hour hike to the crater. On returning to their car they find that it will not start, and oddly all their watches have stopped. This is never explained, but I suppose it has to do with the meteor crater -perhaps. They sit around thinking that they’ll be stuck there for a while, but they see lights approaching them and immediately remember their UFO conversation. Fortunately (or unfortunately as we learn later), it’s not a UFO but Mick (though not Dundee, John Jarratt), a friendly native (the girls describe him “like that crocodile guy on TV”). He offers to give them a tow back to his camp and fix their car for free. He seems friendly enough so they accept. However, his camp turns out to be hours away and not as close as they first thought. The outback is a big place so they take this long ride as just the difference between Mick’s definition of a “little way.” Mick starts to tinker with the car and the kids sit around the campfire and are offered “Nothing like rain water from the Top-End.” They accept the water and fall into sudden, deep sleeps and everything seems okay with the world. I mean they’ve had a hard day right? Well, things are about to get much worse. Things are not so peachy when Liz awakes the next morning alone and tied up in one of the shacks. Sadly for Liz, things just go downhill for our trio from there. Party like its 1999

Party like it's 1999

Wolf Creek will perhaps be inevitably compared to the other horror film of around the same time Hostel. I will not do that because I’ve not seen Hostel, but from what I’ve heard of Hostel appears to be a bit more “stylized” (I reserve the right to disagree with myself if/when I watch Hostel). Wolf Creek has more of a documentary feel to it - which is why I felt very disturbed by this movie. From what I’ve heard of Hostel (see Frankie Dees' Hostel review), it sounds easy to think it’s only a movie, however Wolf Creek is a little harder to think so because of the documentary feel. I feel like a camera crew followed Mick (Crocodile Bloodee?) around as he practiced his “hobby.” The flick was shot with High-Def cameras and there is some nice scenery in the 52 minute (!!!) buildup to the gruesome finale. That buildup will probably turn some off and there is not a lot of excitement is in those 52 minutes. However, I think it makes it feel more documentary-like. Imagine seeing the average road trip (drinking and sparse nudity) and how boring a 52-minute film of that would be. Others also might be annoyed by the rather large moment where characters could’ve killed off Mick easily and effectively ended their torment (and the movie too says the screenplay writer no doubt). Wolf Creek is released in both an unrated (104 minutes) and R-rated (99 minutes) versions. They’re presented in anamorphic widescreen (1.77:1) and are enhanced for 16x9 televisions. Special features include a generous 49-minute making of documentary. It has interviews with writer, director, producer Greg McLean, executive producer Matt Hearn, producer David Lightfoot, director of photography Will Gibson, production designer Robert Webb, make up artists Rick Connelly and Jen Lamphee, editor Jason Ballantine, and actors John Jarratt, Nathan Phillips, Kestie Morassi, Cassandra Magrath.

Nothing like rainwater from the top end

Why is it that the behind the scenes of these horror movies show everyone having such a good time, since the subject matter of the movies is so opposite of the behind the camera fun? I can imagine that such documentaries about romantic comedies should show everyone hating each other. There is also a commentary with Greg McLean, Matt Hearn, Kestie Morassi, and Cassandra Magrath. Finally there’s a deleted scene (38 seconds and silly) and the theatrical trailer. Wolf Creek was not a movie that I truly hated, but was more disturbed by it. The head on a stick scenes still haunt me and my imagings what might’ve happened to that now helpless character. I think a lot of horror hounds might bail out before the gruesome begins since it takes over an hour for the nasties to start. People who found Hostel too stylized may well want to give Wolf Creek a spin, but be prepared to be disturbed during the finale or pissed if you don’t like some of the plot devices.Wolf Creek is now available at Amazon and AmazonUK. Visit the DVD’s database for more information.

And Also

What's the Truth About Brangelina? - PopEater
no articles available.
- The Tech Herald
Jennie Garth throwing a Garden Party, Zucchini and Eggplant need not apply, the interview
Barbra Streisand Turns Down Massive Vegas Payday - PopEater
Johnny Depp death hoax and similar schemes explained - The Tech Herald

Your Talkback on this Story

Latest Headlines in DVD

Older Talkback

page: 1

PatrickL.Apr 20th, 2006 - 00:54:03

I was one of those people who the movie fell flat on. It takes too long to get to the “horror” and, like Hostel, you just don’t care about the characters. The victims are just too plain stupid for falling into the situation, and the killer seems to be too comical to provide any real scares. It does manage to have several disturbing moments, but it is too little too late. The movie does seem to borrow on what has worked for past horror films – a documentary feel of the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre. I think it would have been better if they shortened the time spent getting to Wolf Creek Crater, and maybe made the killer a bit more menacing instead of an almost horror imitation of that other famous Outback hero named Mick.

Report this comment

BrettApr 20th, 2006 - 01:45:35

I suppose it's never a good idea to go into a movie when you're intoxicated(just as I did when seeing this one) because the scary flicks are just never as scary when you're laughing impulsively at things like the way the character runs, or the way old Mick laughs evily. I'm not sure if I would have had a different opinion if I'd been in a sober state of mind, but I don't really have the desire to find out:

I didn't really think it took too long to get into the horror. Because it seems to be what's going to happen naturally, I will compare this one to Hostel a bit: Hostel took much too long for my liking to get into the actual horror of the film. It spent too much time showing the 'great tits' of all the European women in the hosetls. Wolf Creek did a better job getting straight to the action.

I originally didn't really like this film, but after reading this review have some sort of new-found respect for it. It did it's job at being the creepy documentary, and was very true to documentary form. I liked the fact that the girl you thought would get away at the end just barely didn't. You didn't expect it. At the time, I was actually pissed off.

I probably would have liked it just a little bit more if Mick would have caught up with the Australian and one of the chicks could have lived. Why does my gender alawys have to be so weak? Haha.

Report this comment

page: 1

DVD Reviews

DVD Review: Wolf Creek

And Also

Your Talkback on this Story

Latest Headlines in DVD

Older Talkback

Readers Interacting

Wolf Creek

Related Articles

From Sites we Like

Popular Games on M&C

In Monsters and Critics

Corporate

The Fine Print