Books News
Oprah pulls ‘controversial’ book from website
By M&C News Nov 7, 2007, 13:45 GMT
The AP reports that Oprah Winfrey has pulled Forrest Carter's The Education of Little Tree from her website where she lists her recommended titles.
Her reasoning is because although Winfrey admits to enjoying the book and having been ‘moved’ by it, she came to discover that the author was really Asa Earl Carter who was also a member of the Ku Klux Klan and worked as a writer for the former Alabama governor George Wallace on his speeches. Wallace was well known for encouraging segregation.
The article notes that the book has since been removed, but Winfrey had stated, "I no longer — even though I had been moved by the story — felt the same about this book. There's a part of me that said, 'Well, OK, if a person has two sides of them and can write this wonderful story and also write the segregation forever speech, maybe that's OK.' But I couldn't — I couldn't live with that,” according to the AP article.
The President of the American Library Association also mentioned that he had been perplexed by Winfrey’s choice, and then went on to state, "Besides the questions about the author's identity, the book is known for a simplistic plot that used a lot of stereotypical imagery," he stated in the article.
This however should come to no surprise since critics have noted Winfrey’s tendencies to lean towards more cliché filled and simplistic plots when making her selections.
The article can be read in full here.
COMMENT
blog comments powered by DisqusLatest Headlines in Books
- 1. 'Sex, drugs and relationships' Dr. Reef to Book Expo signing in NYC
- 2. Book Review: Song of the Serpent
- 3. Book Review: Bloodman
- 4. Book Review: The Last Myth
- 5. Book Review: Skeleton Picnic
Older Talkback
page: 1
This situation seems to require further exploration by thoughtful people. For more information, see the article …
“Oprah bumps book ‘Education of Little Tree’ from list; readers can explore many factors involved”
By Steve Hammons
AmericanChronicle.com
November 9, 2007
page: 1


ChrisNov 8th, 2007 - 21:52:11
It’s interesting how much the press (and a few bitter members of the public) is salivating over the recent scandal surrounding alleged abused at the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls in South Africa.
My suspicions are that most of the press and critics that are gloating now have absolutely no sincere concern for the welfare of the pupils at the school. This is more about a bit of a ‘gotcha’ factor.
First of all, there were many criticisms made in the press when Oprah first launched the school back in January. People had the nerve to ask why Oprah made the school so lavish – the underlying, sinister thought being why do underprivileged, mostly black girls in South Africa deserve this type of significant investment. Another side of the criticism was questions raised as to why Oprah set up the school in South Africa, instead of inside the United States. Much of Oprah’s philanthropy (educational and otherwise) has been done right here in the U.S. Further, the United States is the wealthiest country in the world, and therefore has the resources to fix the problems it has with its underserved schools; it just lacks the political will to do so. South Africa, on the other hand, does not have the economic resources that the U.S. has. So Oprah decided to extend her contribution there, to help some poverty-stricken children get a quality education. What the hell is wrong with that? As the saying goes, “No good deed goes unpunished”; this is a sad part of our existence.
Secondly, Oprah has achieved unprecedented success, fame, and power, especially as a woman and black person born in 1954, in the United States. And she continues to expand her empire and influence, beyond what most, if not all other celebrities have achieved. With that comes a lot of envy and professional jealousy from some in our society. So whenever the slightest opportunities present themselves, the vultures in our media and general society pounce on it. There has been an ongoing campaign to discredit her, since many know that Oprah’s greatest asset is her credibility. From the James Frey debacle to the more recent issues surrounding the scandal at her school and questions raised about books mentioned on her show or Web-site, the misleading angle of most reports is to suggest that Oprah [knowingly] supports or endorses something that turns out to have some flaws.
When Oprah supports someone or builds a school, there is absolutely no way she can predict who involved might betray her trust. It’s a risk. You put your faith in people, and given that people are people, some of them will unfortunately disappoint you. I don’t see how you can be blamed for the actions of other people. After having learned about the alleged abuse at her school, if Oprah had done nothing to address it, then I would blame her, but she acted immediately to take corrective action. But, no, this was yet another opportunity for some in the media to try to pull her down, yet again. Some of us just can’t be happy for other people’s success, because we feel insecure in our own self-worth when we see others excelling. We are told that this is part of human nature. However, not everyone behaves this way, and hopefully we can evolve past this dark side of our supposed ‘nature’.
There are those who hate Oprah for her philosophy on life; her remarkable success; her politics; her race; her posing on O magazine cover each month (it’s her magazine, so she can do whatever she wants, and her fans don’t seem to mind since the magazine is still so successful); and her apparent omnipresence in American culture.
Whatever the case is, I think Oprah has recognized that you can’t be liked by everyone. In fact, no one is. She is spiritual and has also developed a keen sense of differentiating between constructive criticism and destructive criticism; after all, the intentions behind each of those are clearly different.
Report this comment